Ethnography and Ambiguity
Episode Description
In this episode of Talking about Methods, Professor Linda Mulcahy talks to Dr Nafay Choudhury about ethnography and ambiguity. Nafay shares his experiences embracing ambiguity as a strength of ethnographic work, drawing on his research with Afghanistan’s money exchangers. He highlights the need for ethnographers to be upfront about the limits of what they can know, their positionality, and to centre complex stories of their interlocutors. He explains why ethnography is a bit like fishing, how to fight ethnographic decay through habitual note-taking, and why it takes stamina beyond fieldwork.
Readings recommended by Nafay Choudhury
Roitman, J. (2005) Fiscal Disobedience: An Anthropology of Economic Regulation in Central Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chua, L.J. and Massoud, M.F. (eds.) (2024) Out of Place: Fieldwork and Positionality in Law and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009338219.
Geertz, C. (1972) ‘Deep play: Notes on the Balinese cockfight’, Daedalus, 101(1), pp. 1–37.
Work by the Speaker:
Choudhury, N., & Schmeding, A. (Eds.). (2025). Frontier Ethnographies: Deconstructing Research Experiences in Afghanistan and Pakistan (1st ed.). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.14170589